Introduction.

Nobility and altruism.

This new hypothesis started as ‘white nativism’ which to begin with was very white and heavily engrossed in Celtic, Anglo-Saxon and Viking art, symbolism and culture. (Check my very first posts for proof). White nativism eventually developed into the hypothesis of the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism. Whether you think that white nativism is racist or not I do not care. Politically accurate people are very altruistic and noble, we passionately believe in our own people and we deliberately pursue poverty and low status to that end. However, it is entirely relative and depends on who you ask. White nativism started with the following statement:

The poorer you are the more native you are.

This statement is entirely noble and altruistic and was thought of out of total and genuine care and concern for my own people, the native Europeans. 

The following statement proves that the poorer you are the more native you are:

The more advanced (or rich) you are the more responsible you are and therefore the more guilty you are of sin, therefore, the more primitive (or poor) you are the less responsible you are and therefore the less guilty you are of sin. 

This means:

  1. It does not matter to God if a primitive animal kills another animal or even a human and similarly it was less of an issue for primitive prehistoric people to kill another human than it is for advanced modern people to do so today. We advanced modern people get in much more trouble with God for such acts today, as we should no better.
  2. It is also the reason why rich people such as the Queen have to have such good manners and elocution, while the poor lower classes can comically ‘get away with murder’ when it comes to dirty or vulgar humour. The lower class can say or do what they like. This is another reason why politically accurate people deliberately pursue poverty and low status. 

Read the whole website before you judge me, and see if I am not noble and altruistic.

Field?

What field exactly is the hypothesis of the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism?

It is my faith and my belief.

Beaten by a 2019 year old man?

What is the one thing that nobody or no thing in creation has done that Jesus Christ and the Buddha did? What is the one difference between say the Queen or superstar DJs and Jesus Christ or the Buddha?

Money.

Apart from Christ and the Buddha and perhaps Saint Francis of Assisi, no human has ever deliberately given all their money away, or deliberately pursued poverty.

Francis of Assisi.
Saint Francis of Assisi. His sanctity was based first and foremost on his deliberate pursuit of poverty.

No matter how high and advanced we get ultimately we are all beaten by an ancient and primitive 2019 year old man. How? It must be relative.

Animals are funny.

No animal has ever cared for or healed another sick or injured animal.

Some higher primates share food in exchange for something else, however, no animal in creation has ever generously given away food or energy to another animal out of kindness or charity.

“A squirrel has never given a nut to another squirrel out of generosity or charity.”

C57A564F-3BC9-41A8-A667-3207870AC4A7
Squirrel from the Ice Age movies.

The benefits of sociality are not limited to mutual protection and cooperative behaviours such as food-sharing have been documented for some of the higher primates, including chimpanzees, bonobos and capuchin monkeys.

Grooming appears to be pivotal in holding primate coalitions together, although it is not the only social tool that has been observed. Food-sharing also plays an important role. Male chimpanzees exchange meat for support against adversaries and have also been known to raid domestic crops for items that may be traded against favours.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 24-25).

Jesus or Einstein?

Who do you believe in Albert Einstein or Jesus Christ? What is unfundamental in the universe? Human created things like the arts? God created things like the soul? The sciences are fundamental, but Jesus Christ and the Buddha were not advanced scientists, they were deities who talked in simple parables that even the lowliest could comprehend. It takes years of research and studying to understand Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity, (in short relativity is too advanced or complex), where as everyone can understand Jesus Christ’s and the Buddha’s teachings without any training. Therefore, although the sciences may get us to the stars, our hopes, dreams and aspirations for the human soul are with faith and the arts. Human beings are unfundamental, we are funny, comical and loving and perceive things like art and pareidolia, we are not boring and mathematical robots. Because the Christ and the Buddha were ancient men what does that tell us? It tells us that you do not need to be modern or advanced to have a higher state of consciousness, you can be primitive. No matter how high and advanced we get ultimately we are all beaten by an ancient and primitive 2019 year old man. How? It must be relative.

Gautama Buddha.
Before Siddhārtha Gautama became Buddha he was the son of a king and lived a life of opulence in a palace, hidden from the miseries of the world. He then renounced his wealth and deliberately pursued poverty and practiced extreme self-mortification, almost dying of starvation in the process. Because of this Herculean sacrifice from a rich life to one of abject poverty and suffering (or reversal of divine merit), Siddhārtha Gautama then consequently attained nirvana and became the Buddha.

Involuntary faith.

Why did human beings or hominins invent and pursue the divine and God (or gods) before anything else such as science? Science is a relatively modern invention, but the gods have been around since prehistory. Human beings are like magnets to the divine, we just do it involuntarily and unconsciously without thinking about it. If you just pause for a second, you can ask why did we do it? This is what scientists do. Humans have no proof of God yet we just involuntarily believe. Humans need to know, hope or believe that there is an afterlife or an end and point to all our suffering. Why did we humans not come with all knowledge of what is wrong and what is right from the beginning? Why were we not perfect angels instead of vicious animals? We humans learn, that is in the scale of things we do not know something is wrong until after it has happened, and then we learn through being punished. For example in the beginning nobody told cavemen not to be harsh, nobody told cavemen not to steal, nobody told cavemen not to rape, nobody told cavemen not to murder and nobody told cavemen not to cannibalise. That is until after they had done all these things. We living creatures of life receive no help from God or anyone, we are on our own, we are 100% independent and we learn on our own. Why do we have to undergo temporary suffering in life before we attain eternal bliss in the afterlife?

0F33E21C-F7D5-4A4A-84E2-F4C9E3F92AD0
The tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden bearing the forbidden fruit which Adam and Eve disobediently ate.

Because we receive no help from God and because we do not or did not know all things about what is right and what is wrong from the beginning, and because we suffer life before heaven, this must mean there is forgiveness and a second chance. The second chance is the afterlife. Cavemen certainly needed a second chance. Who doesn’t need a second chance apart from Jesus Christ?

Jesus carrying the cross.
Jesus carrying the cross.

The age old unconscious and involuntary belief or faith in the divine proves that there is a God and an afterlife.

The Middle Way.

Imagine if doctors, General Practioners and surgeons were like Buddhist or Christian monks and cured and saved peoples lives not for money, but just to keep in the Buddha’s Middle Way. They would be truly advanced beings. Like this analogy, I am a practitioner of the hypothesis of the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism, which operates or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts. I am deliberately practicing charity. I also read literature, mix music, and practice relativity and botany, in order to balance the arts with the sciences or the unfundamental with the fundamental.

Symbolism.

Art, literature and science are all consequences of a behavioural package anthropologists refer to as ‘modern human behaviour.’ These things would not be possible without our ability to use symbols to convey information. Symbols can take the form of sounds, images or objects. They may refer directly to an object or idea, for example a representational image; they may be totally abstract, such as spoken or written words. Thus for example a drawing of a cat, the sound ‘cat’ or the written letters ‘c-a-t’ may all be used to refer to a cat.

Syntactic language is a system of communication that enables an effectively infinite range of meanings to be conveyed, but it is only one component of our ability to use symbols – an ability we do not share with our fellow apes. We use symbols all the time – whenever we read a newspaper, check the time, consult a map or admire a painting or sculpture. All of these activities involve symbolic behaviour: human society could not function without it.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 19).

Animals are funny.

Art is similar to pareidolia. Pareidolia is where a being perceives patterns in random data. For example humans can perceive faces in clouds or shapes of animals in rock formations. This is the difference between humans and animals, as in other than camouflage, animals cannot perceive pareidolia. For example animals cannot perceive cave paintings, or recognise the object or image of the lines and shapes of pigment, they just see a wall.

Altamira bisons.
Altamira bisons, Cave of Altamira, Spain, Upper Paleolithic, around 36,000 years ago.

Unless it is moving or stinking animals cannot perceive an another animal. To an animal the ability to read, recognise art and perceive pareidolia is telepathy. When Palaeolithic man and woman started to (not coincidentally) paint ‘animals’ in caves he or she must have perceived pareidolia, therefore by creating such timeless masterpieces, Palaeolithic man and woman proved beyond a doubt that he or she was far beyond animal.

33,000 year old hand stencil by a paleolithic visitor to a cave at Chauvet Pont d’Arc in the south of France.
33,000 year old hand stencil by a paleolithic visitor to a cave at Chauvet Pont d’Arc in the south of France.

Note the above image is how humans did a signature before they could write. However, I wonder what his or her name was? We know nothing about the names, individual characters or spirituality of prehistoric men and women, just bones and stones. Hence, because we do not and cannot ever know the names of prehistoric man down here on Earth but only in Heaven, therefore hallowed be your name and on Earth as in Heaven is for prehistoric man.

Symmetry.

Pareidolia is unfundamental unlike the sciences such as mathematics, relativity and botany, it is needless like the arts including religion, art, philosophy, literature, drama and music. It is very human. The sciences like https://mathsandtime.com are perfect, precise, ordered, symmetrical and fundamental.

00891CB9-2DDD-4964-93BD-451F859BE276
Time.

The arts such as philosophy and proverbs are imperfect, imprecise, random, asymmetrical and unfundamental.

The Golden Bird.
The Proverb of the Golden Bird.

William Shakespeare’s plays are about as random, unfundamental and wet as you can get. I admit I questioned the spiritual and divine and the arts when I was studying https://mathsandtime.com, which is simple relativity. However, thespianism and the arts are beautiful and wet while the sciences are unattractive and dry. William Shakespeare is the Einstein of the random, unfundamental and wet.

Uncle Monty.
“I will never play the dane!” Uncle Monty, an eccentric Shakespearean actor-character from the film Withnail and I, 1987.

It was a postulate that I called The Proverb of The Golden Bird which made me understand that Jesus Christ and the Buddha were not geeky scientists, they were deities who simply talked in parables which everyone could understand. It takes years of effort and studying to comprehend Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, where as everyone can easily understand Jesus Christ’s and the Buddha’s message. Therefore our hopes, dreams and aspirations for the soul are with the arts, including proverbs, parables, philosophy, religion, art, literature, drama and music while there is nothing in https://mathsandtime.com. Be happy you are human, as humans are better than animals.

Spirituality and time.

When I was studying https://mathsandtime.com, I went through a phase of secular and rational thinking in which I lost all faith in things spiritual and divine, including all the arts such as religion, music, art, literature, drama and philosophy. I lost all faith in all musicians I formerly liked, I said to myself why listen to them when there is Albert Einstein? I even questioned history as in what is the point of studying say Roman history? Then I said to myself of course Roman history is very important and then I read a book about it. Because I was studying https://magnitudeoftime.com I stated rational things like “time is not spiritual or divine” and “do not seek spiritual enlightenment, seek time intellectually” and “never listen to electronic beats, all you need is a ticking clock” and I really believed it!

When I was studying https://squareoftime.com, I said that if you want to say something, say it with mathematics, formulas and equations not with lyrics or philosophy etc. I was wrong. The problem with mathematics and physics is that although you can fundamentally command people with formulas and equations much better than you can with philosophy, they are actually utterly devoid of any philosophical or political content. Therefore, we have absolutely no hope or dreams for our salvation or for forgiveness (particularly to do with the Holocaust) with mathematics, physics and the sciences etc. Hence, although the arts such as proverbs, parables, lyrics, literature, art, music and philosophy do not command people in the same way that equations and formulas do, they have moral and political content and can inspire people and can change the world

Proverb.

To reiterate, when I discovered the hypothesis I called the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism, it made me understand that Jesus Christ and the Buddha were not advanced scientists, they were deities who talked in simple parables, which everyone can understand, whereas to understand the general theory of relativity we need years of training and education. It was a simple proverb called The Proverb of The Golden Bird that initially changed my scientific and secular thinking and turned me back to the arts and the unfundamental.

The golden bird.
The Proverb of The Golden Bird.

Mixing.

The hypothesis of the reversal of divine merit of nativism and primitivism operates or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts because the poorer you are the more native you are, therefore it made me believe in the unfundamental. Like Shakespeare, mixing and the electronic music industry is as random, unfundamental and wet as you can get. Contrary to my former statement, “never listen to electronic beats, all you need is a ticking clock” I would now like to state that mixing music is simply beautiful and hip in a way that science can never be. Thousands of people flock to clubs, events and gigs with superstar DJs every weekend, where as no one flocks to a mathematics or physics classroom.

Conclusion.

To conclude, although I love https://timemagnitude.com and will always do it as well as other sciences, I have concluded that there is hope for the soul with faith and the arts such as proverbs, parables, philosophy, literature, religion, art, drama and music while there is nothing in https://mathsandtime.com. The Christ and the Buddha were not advanced geeky scientists, they were deities who talked in simple parables which anyone could grasp. Hence, I choose faith and the arts over science. However, I will always do both and hope to balance and play the fundamental and the unfundamental off of each other.